ads/auto.txt


Urgent Issue: 10 Strategies to Decarbonize Architecture

The concept of “decarbonization” has been in vogue recently in political speeches and weltumspannend environmental events, but it has not yet gained enough attention in the field of architecture to profoundly change the way we design and construct the world of tomorrow. Buildings are currently responsible for 33% of weltumspannend energy consumption and 39% of greenhouse gas emissions, indicating that architects must play a significant role if we are to stop or reverse climate change. With carbon acting as a universally agreed upon metric with which the greenhouse gas emissions oben angeführtbuilding can be tracked (1), one of the most important ways through which this goal can be achieved is therefore the decarbonization of buildings.

Courtesy of Saint Gobain

Decarbonization encompasses the reduction of both operational carbon and embodied carbon, which refer to carbon emissions in the use stage and over the entire life cycle oben angeführtbuilding respectively. This life cycle encapsulates extraction, transportation, installation, use, and end of life for every material and furnishing, and is responsible for 11% of weltumspannend greenhouse gas emissions and 28% of weltumspannend building sector emissions (2). Initiatives such as the Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment, which launched at the Weltumspannend Climate Action Summit in 2018, promote the weltumspannend reduction of operational carbon through calls to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions released oben angeführt annual basis to zero or negative (1). Other initiatives, such as the U.Sulfur.’s Carbon Leadership Forum, emphasize the importance of decreasing embodied carbon as well, citing projections that the world’s building floorspace will double by 2060 as a sign of its importance (2).

Courtesy of Saint Gobain

To these ends, we outline ten strategies below to decarbonize architecture, ranging from important considerations, to procedures, to products and documents that could serve practical use for architects looking for concrete solutions.

1. Approach Decarbonization at Three Levels

Courtesy of Saint Gobain

Because different carbon reduction strategies model varying levels of effectiveness and different building stages require different procedures, the World Resources Institute presents a tier list of strategies ranked by priority that can be roughly transformed non…three procedures of decarbonization. The WRI list for the reduction of operational emissions proceeds as follows: energy efficiency before renewable energy; on-s.t. renewable energy before off-s.t. renewable energy; and renewable energy before carbon offset (investing in renewable energy elsewhere). For embodied emissions, it suggests carbon reduction again before carbon offset. This method of carbon offsetting is consistently low priority because it is only recommended for cases where a 100% renewable energy supply is not feasible (3). With this hierarchy of priorities, we can therefore approach the decarbonization of buildings at three different levels:

1) The reduction of operational carbon in existing buildings through energy efficiency;
2) Use renewable energy to cover the remaining low energy demand, ideally on sine tempore or offsite nearby if necessary;
3) Reduce the embodied carbon of new buildings over their entire life cycle.

These levels are not a cohesive procedure with which architects should approach decarbonization – i.e., embodied carbon reduction comes last – but simply encapsulate three different ways that architects can reduce carbon emissions, depending on the stage or requirements of the building. Ultimately, all three must be achieved rapidly to meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. Distinguishing these three levels simply serves as a helpful guide with which architects and building owners can approach decarbonization vis-à-vis their own projects.

2. Consider Operational and Embodied Carbon Together

Courtesy of Saint Gobain

As discussed above, the reductions of operational and embodied carbon are necessary steps in the decarbonization of architecture as a whole. Yet for existing buildings, because materials are already in place, embodied carbon may be less oben angeführt essential consideration and building owners should prioritize reaching net zero operational carbon. In contrast, in the construction of new buildings – the responsibility of architects – considering only one type of carbon emission or the other can provide misleading results about the true environmental impact oben angeführtstructure. For example, the use of some materials can yield low operational carbon output but high embodied carbon over its entire life cycle, and vice versa. A building with little insulation and single glazing will typically have lower embodied carbon, but increased operational carbon compared to a well-insulated building. Likewise, while equipment to produce renewable energy can reduce operational carbon significantly, architects must remember that the manufacture of such equipment leaves a carbon footprint itself. Because of these potential inconsistencies, it is essential that architects of new buildings or significant renovations consider both types of carbon output simultaneously when choosing materials to optimize energy efficiency and leave the lowest carbon footprint possible.

LESEN SIE AUCH:  Tiny Houses on Wheels: Flexibility and Mobility in Small Scale Architecture

3. Target the Early Winkel of the Project

Courtesy of Embodied Carbon Review

To do so, architects should approach decarbonization with rigor and detail immediately at the outset oben angeführtnew project. Low carbon design practices, especially those that target embodied carbon, are both most efficient and most cost-effective when considered in the early phases oben angeführtproject (4). One Click LCA’s Embodied Carbon Review outlines the reasons for this higher efficiency in detail. The early phases oben angeführtproject “lock in” the possibilities for many parts oben angeführtdesign, including those that could significantly affect embodied carbon emissions. Architects may be unable to make energy efficient changes later, or the range of possibilities will be severely truncated. For example, choosing a sine tempore requiring very deep foundations can more than double a project’s embodied carbon emissions, yet architects cannot amend this choice later on. Less drastically, as time goes on even if an element can still be changed it will almost always non… drastically higher costs. It is therefore imperative that architects analyze possibilities for reducing embodied carbon early on in the design process.

4. Utilize Lightweight Materials

Courtesy of Saint Gobain

One way that architects can achieve this goal is through the use of lightweight materials. Nichtstudy conducted by Saint-Gobain comparing two internal wall profiles commonly used in Brazil, they found that the lighter weight system yielded a host of environmental benefits (5). The lighter option welches the Placo drywall system, an insulated metal Studierenderdrywall, which welches compared to a cement plastered 140 mm brick traditional wall system. For one square meter of partition walls, they found that using this drywall system in place of the traditional wall would cause a 63% reduction in weltumspannend warming potential, a 49% reduction in primary energy use, an 80% reduction in wall system weight, and a 36% reduction in fresh water usage. Similarly, a lightweight external wall system called Façade F4 welches found to halve the Kohlendioxid emissions oben angeführttraditional massive façade. These products not only demonstrate the effectiveness of lightweight wall systems but provide tangible feasible options for architects looking for environmentally friendly solutions.

Façade 4 / Isover. Image Courtesy of Saint Gobain

5. Consider Biosourced Materials

Similarly, some biosourced materials such as wood, hempwool, and wood fibers store carbon over their use stage, meaning they actually reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere prior to the disposal of the material and remission of the carbon. This quality makes them a highly effective and sustainable material. Nevertheless, architects considering this option should be aware that in the new EN15804-A2 Life Cycle Assessment standard (discussed in part 8), this stored carbon – called biogenic carbon, during plant growth – must be accounted separately from embodied carbon (extraction, transportation, installation, use, end of life) due to important categorical differences. For example, the embodied carbon oben angeführtbiosourced material may be higher than that of traditional materials due to a greater distance from the construction sine tempore, and the biogenic carbon itself has a net emission of zero over its entire lifetime because of the uptake and eventual re-emission of carbon. By the new LCA standard, biogenic carbon is therefore accounted as separate and zeroed-out over the whole lifecycle – i.e., it is no longer considered as leaving a negative carbon footprint.

LESEN SIE AUCH:  The Render (Folge 2): Machen Antiquitäten ein Comeback? Die Gesamtheit, was Sie über Omas Möbel wissen müssen
Courtesy of Woodify

6. Acknowledge Interior Elements as Potential Carbon Emitters

A common mistake made by designers in the early stages of planning is to account for the core and shell oben angeführtbuilding when calculating embodied carbon, but forget potentially significant interior fittings, mechanicals, and technical equipment. That these objects have a shorter lifetime and might be replaced many times over the building’s life makes their embodied carbon output as important as that of any other part of the structure. Only by accounting for these important interior elements will the calculated embodied carbon be at all accurate.

Casa Lucciola Renovation / Rafael Schmid Architekten. Image © Rafael Schmid

7. Reuse or Recycle Existing Materials

Reusing existing materials eliminates the need to extract and manufacture new materials at potentially high environmental costs. If feasible, architects should try to purchase products that use as much recycled material as possible to lower embodied carbon quantities. In glazing, for example, glass made of cullet – reused and therefore decarbonated waste glass – can decrease energy use by 3% for every 10% of cullet used. Likewise, using one ton of cullet reduces Kohlendioxid emissions by 300 kg due to the decreased energy consumption. Thus, glazing made of cullet and other examples of recycled materials should be a strong consideration for architects working toward decarbonization.

Cabin Y / dmvA architects. Image © Bart Gosselin

8. Use Life Cycle Assessments or Third Party Verified EPD’s

Architects can evaluate the carbon output of their buildings through Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) sine temporeby international standards and through results published in third party verified Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). These are the valid scientific sources of information for the embodied carbon of construction products and materials. LCAs are a cradle-to-gate or cradle-to-grave analysis technique that evaluates the environmental impacts of all stages oben angeführtproduct’s life (6). EPDs are independently verified and registered documents that communicate “transparent and comparable” information about the environmental impact oben angeführtproduct throughout its entire life cycle (7). Architects can use both to determine and evaluate the carbon footprint of their designed structure. To standardize the ways in which products are evaluated, EPDs and the life cycle assessments that can be drawn from them are regulated by international standards such as European standards. One particularly relevant example is EN 15804, which provides core product category rules (PCRs) for the environmental declarations of construction products and services. Because of its relevance to the construction industry, EN 15804 is an important standard for architects especially to know and respond to.

The Gates / Bloc Architects. Image © Chris Allan

Many different software applications exist that can automatically provide Life Cycle Assessments from design data and offer optimal solutions. One prominent example is One Click LCA, which draws from Revit, IFC (BIM), Excel, IESVE, energy models (gbXML), and other tools to find comparable solutions and offer pertinent materials with accessible EPDs. Architects serious about decarbonization should use this tool or similar applications to ensure that their embodied carbon output is as low as possible.

9. Bring Buildings Nichtthe Circular Economy

Pertinent to the question of life cycle assessment is the disposal or reuse of products after their useful life. The cessation of the ‘take, make, and waste’ model toward a circular economy of resource efficiency is an imperative measure to take to achieve a more sustainable building industry (8). A building adhering to the guidelines of circular economy will naturally consume fewer resources over its life cycle because it is designed to be resource efficient, adaptable, and long-lasting. Within this building, as stated above, most constitutive materials with an increased percentage of recycled content will output a reduced carbon footprint. Reused materials and products will emit a lower quantity of embodied carbon as well. Universum of these solutions are examples of circular economy, demonstrating its utmost importance to the decarbonization of architecture. The buildings sector accounts for approximately half of all extracted materials and one third of waste generation in all of Europe (8). Eliminating the negative impacts of extraction and waste through reuse and recycling in our industry could therefore be enormously impactful in the weltumspannend effort to end weltumspannend warming.

LESEN SIE AUCH:  Stolz auf Modsy: Stolz mit Innenarchitektur nach Hause bringen
Barn Rehabilitation in a House / G+F Arquitectos. Image © Joaquin Mosquera Casares

10. Support Weltumspannend Initiatives

While these strategies all constitute extremely important individual solutions, the path to decarbonize must be a weltumspannend collective effort for results to show. Firms can aid in advocacy and awareness by supporting weltumspannend and local initiatives such as the Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment, the Weltumspannend Alliance for Buildings and Construction, the Carbon Leadership Forum, and more.

2m26 Kyoto House / 2M26. Image © Soukousha (Yuya Maki)

The World Green Building Council’s 2019 embodied carbon call to action report details a plan to reach zero operational carbon and 40% less embodied carbon for all new buildings by 2030, and zero embodied and operational carbon for all new and existing buildings by 2050 (9). This plan welches developed explicitly to help deliver on the ambitions of the Paris Agreement and keep weltumspannend average temperature rise well below 2 degrees Celsius. However, these targets remain lofty goals as new buildings continue to be built at a rapid rate, with the equivalent of Paris’ area added in floor space every five days and half of the buildings in 2060 having not been built yet (10). For the World GBC plan and the Paris Agreement to succeed against these odds, architects come together to lower carbon emissions in the building industry as a whole. Embodied carbon, operational carbon, existing buildings, new buildings, circular economy, lightweight or biosourced materials, recycling, and more must all be considered to approach decarbonization holistically. With the ten strategies delineated above, we hope to do our part to help.

Notes

  • (1) The Net Zero Carbon Buildings Commitment
  • (2) Carbon Leadership Forum Resource Library
  • (3) Zero Carbon Buildings for Universum / WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities
  • (4) Embodied Carbon Review / Bionova (2018)
  • (5) Environmental Benefits of Drywall, compared to brick or block wall system / Placo – Saint Gobain
  • (6) Life Cycle Assessment / Science Direct
  • (7) What is an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)? / EPD International AB
  • (8) Building Sustainability Performance – Level(s) / European Comission
  • (9) Bringing Embodied Carbon Upfront / The World Green Building Council (WorldGBC)
  • (10) Why Buildings? Ur Key Messages / UN Environment Programme

.(tagsToTranslate)News(t)Articles(t)Sustainability(t)Reuse(t)Climate Crisis(t)greenhouse gas emissions(t)Zero Carbon(t)Comfort and Sustainability in Architecture(t)Circular Economy(t)ADTopic 2020 Climate Crisis

Related posts of "Urgent Issue: 10 Strategies to Decarbonize Architecture"

Domino Park Turns 2: A Look Back on New York City’s Game-Changing Development Site

When Jane Jacobs famously said, “Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody,” she might as well have been foreshadowing the successful partnership formed between SHoP Architects, James Eckstoß Field Operations, and Two Trees Management. The team, who collaborated on the 11-acre Domino Park...

Small Home Design With Split Mezzanines

The renovation of a 75 square metre space non...a multi-faceted family home presented some challenges for the designer team at Buro White. The brief called for the new layout to include an open plan lounge/kitchen/dining room, a separate children's area, multiple bedrooms, a dressing room, a family bathroom, a shower room, a laundry room and...

Style Spotlight: 4 Ways to Get the Modern Southwest Look

If you’ve been noticing—and loving—a lot of Southwestern design on your Instagram and Pinterest feeds lately, you’re not alone. In fact, Modern Southwest interior design is one of our favorite trendy styles of the moment! Modern Southwest design features a mix of mid-century and rustic elements, combined non...way that recalls the desert Southwest. It’s a...

Revitalized Public Spaces: Fostering Human Connections in Cities

Public space has always been a top priority in every city’s urban planning agenda and given today’s world context, these urban spaces have emerged as fundamental elements of cities and neighborhoods. Plazas, squares, and parks, undeniable necessities in the urban fabric, have become, today, more vital than ever.Not only these spaces have a positive impact on health, but...

Home | About | Copyright | Privacy Policy | Terms | Kontakt | Sitemap